Saturday, March 15, 2025

The place Design Considering for Social Change Goes Improper


Notes

1 Sarah Fathallah and A.D. Sean Lewis, “Abolish the Cop Inside Your (Designer’s) Head: Unraveling the Hyperlinks Between Design and Policing,” Design Museum Journal, vol. 18, 2021.

2  Lorraine Gamman & Adam Thorpe, “Makeright—Luggage of Connection: Instructing Design Considering and Making in Jail to Assist Construct Empathic and Resilient Communities,” She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, vol. 4, no. 1, 2018.

3 Jocelyn Wyatt et al., “The Subsequent Chapter in Design for Social Innovation,” Stanford Social Innovation Overview, vol. 19, subject 1, 2021.

4 Anne-Laure Fayard, “Making Time for Social Innovation: How Open IDEO Mixed Clock-Time and Occasion-Time to Nurture Concept Technology and Social Impression,” Group Science, forthcoming.

5 Arturo Escobar, “Designing as a Futural Praxis for the Therapeutic of the Net of Life,” in Design in Disaster: New Worlds, Philosophies and Practices, edited by Tony Fry & Adam Nocek, London: Routledge, 2020.

6 Sasha Costanza-Chock, Design Justice: Neighborhood-Led Practices to Construct the Worlds We Want, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2020.

7 There are a number of design theorists and practitioners whose work may very well be named right here. For the sake of brevity, we provide three. On sustainability, see Victor Papanek, Design for the Actual World: Human Ecology and Social Change, New York: Pantheon Books, 1971; on decolonization, see Elizabeth Tunstall, Decolonizing Design: A Cultural Justice Guidebook, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2023; on anticapitalism, see Matthew Wizinsky, Design After Capitalism: Reworking Design Immediately for an Equitable Tomorrow, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2022.

8 Sarah Fathallah, “Why Design Researchers Ought to Compensate Contributors,” Notes Off the Grid, Medium, April 7, 2020; Sarah Fathallah, “Confronting the Energy Designers Wield.” UX Collective, September 10, 2021; Sarah Fathallah, “Trauma Responsiveness in Participatory Analysis,” Consider Us, September 9, 2022; Sarah Fathallah, “An Ethic of Take care of Analysis Contributors as Trauma Survivors,” Consider Us, April 3, 2023.

9 Chicago Past, Why Am I All the time Being Researched?, Fairness Collection, vol. 1, 2018.

10 See Anne-Laure Fayard et al., “Designing Providers at Engine (B): Co-designing for Well being and the Home Surroundings,” Case Reference 411-021-1, the Case Centre, 2011.

11 Sarah Fathallah & Sarah Sullivan, Away From Residence: Youth Experiences of Institutional Placements in Foster Care, Consider Us, July 21, 2021.

12 Joyce Yee et al., “Measuring Impression,” in Design for Social Innovation: Case Research from Across the World, edited by Mariana Amatullo et al., New York: Routledge, 2022.

13 Thomas Each, “Human-Centered, Techniques-Minded Design,” Stanford Social Innovation Overview, March 9, 2018.

14 Along with the references talked about all through this text, we provide the next works for exploration: Arturo Escobar, Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds, Chapel Hill, N.C.: Duke College Press, 2018; Batya Friedman & David G. Hendry, Worth Delicate Design: Shaping Know-how with Ethical Creativeness, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2019; Kat Holmes, Mismatch: How Inclusion Shapes Design, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2020; Claudia Mareis et al., eds., Design Struggles: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies, and Views, Amsterdam: Valiz, 2021; Ron Wakkary, Issues We May Design for Extra Than Human-Centered Worlds, Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2021; and op. cit. Papanek’s Design for the Actual World and Fry & Nocek’s Design in Disaster.



Related Articles

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest Articles